• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (9)
  •  

City approves shared funding with Chinook for all-weather track at SCCHS

Latest News

Latest News

Published on February 22, 2013
Published on February 22, 2013
Elisabeth Dowson  RSS Feed
Topics :
Chinook School Division , City of Swift Current Recreation & Parks , Swift Current , Saskatchewan

The City of Swift Current and the Chinook School Division have each approved shared funding to construct the first all-weather eight-lane track in southwest Saskatchewan, based on tenders that were solicited in January 2013, with the contract awarded to Playtech Enterprises Inc. for synthetic surfacing and the civil tender awarded to South Rock Ltd.

The Chinook School Division approved their contribution of $645,355 plus taxes at their Feb. 11, 2013 board meeting, subject to City Council’s formal approval. The total cost of the track and field project to be cost-shared is $1,290,710, and will see the existing six-lane dirt track replaced by an eight-lane all-weather synthetic surface track.

“We’re really excited about it,” said Dean Robson, Director of Recreation & Parks for the City. “We’re excited about our partnership with the Chinook School Division, and that everybody has the potential to use it when it’s done.”

Both parties are in the process of developing a joint-use agreement for routine maintenance, future track resurfacing and amenities, scheduling, policies and practices.

“In regards to gates being locked … we certainly would have an arrangement that when it’s not being used specifically for track with the Comp program, that anyone could use it. … This, in reality, is something that we’re all going to share and we’re all going to be able to use, and on those Saturdays or evenings or times when the actual track and field athletes aren’t on it, it will be open to anyone.

“The people that do the coaching there, high-performance athletes, but as well the location to use it for general type health and wellness activities, fits greatly with our plans. If we get into the next steps, the bigger events such as was mentioned tonight by Councillor Bowditch in regards to Summer Games, there is a potential that it could be used, and it would help us with our bid for the games.”

Councillor Ron Toles was not convinced that the general public would enjoy a full 50 per cent shared use of the track, so he voted against the motion to approve funding at the Council meeting Feb. 19.

“I’m not opposed to the all-weather track,” clarified Toles. “I’m opposed to the way it was being financed and funded. It just seems to me that we’re spending more than our share, based on what we’ll get back in return.

“I like the idea of the track. It’s going to be good for the city, and there’s no other way to get it other than in partnership with the school, but I had to look at what I thought was right.”

Toles acknowledged that the joint-use agreement is still being negotiated.

“If we get 50 per cent use of the track, then I’m more in favour of it, but I know that the schools are going to be using it more. I question whether the school will be open in the evening for us to use dressing rooms. As seniors, will we be able to go into a dressing room on a Sunday? I don’t know that. If that happens then I’m more in favour of it, but until I see the final proposal, I’m saying we’re paying more than our share.”

Council awarded the synthetic surfacing work of $230,081.25 plus applicable taxes to Playtech Enterprises Inc. and $914,445 plus applicable taxes for civil work to SouthRock Ltd.

Comments

  • Username
    Bert
    - February 26, 2013 at 19:58:07

    I just can't imagine what this council can be thinking? (or some of them) to spend this kind of money on something a few people will use, when you cant drive on our streets, and we are still using uncontrolled intersections where there should be lights, and the list goes on and on and on!! In my personal opinion this just screams kick-backs!!!

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Bert
      - March 13, 2013 at 20:23:27

      I find it so questionable that every time something is to be "thought up" or built in this City, that it is always a company from Medicine Hat that is awarded the contract ???????????? This has been going on since the construction of the Medicine Hat Oops i mean Swift current mall??????????????? years ago. Maybe its time that taxpayers look into this to see if all of these contract awarded companies are somehow related?? Nah, couldn't be??

  • Username
    Rachel
    - February 25, 2013 at 14:49:57

    I have to agree with Paul. The city has bigger priorities than an all weather track that only a handful of people will use. A big waste of tax payer money.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - February 25, 2013 at 11:43:15

    We're long overdue for lights at a number of bad intersections in the city and long overdue for repairs to washboard streets pretty much everywhere in the city. It's a no-brainer that those things are more critical to the people living here than the very small number of people who will use that track at the expense of the TAX PAYER for the well under 50% of the time we paid for. Clearly a bad case here of not knowing who pays the bills and/or some personal gain involved becaue of its construction.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dale Wilson
    - February 24, 2013 at 20:23:58

    Its about time there was an all weather track available, money well spent.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Paul
    - February 24, 2013 at 08:23:30

    No we don't want the track for the exact reasons Mr. Toles pointed out. It will be under-used by the greneral public so it shouldn't have been funded as such. Money doesn't grow on trees and the hole we are digging here is already deep enough that the next two generations won't have it paid off. There are bigger problems here to spend money on, not every want and whim of 1% of the population. And, last time I checked there were two tracks to run on in this city if people so desire to train for something. Not like we have nothing.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lawrence
    - February 22, 2013 at 20:37:12

    So, our youth don't deserve the opportunity to train and benefit as athletes? We wouldn't want the track so we could attract the Saskatchewan Summer Games some year? We wouldn't want to improve our community in any way? We do not need to stay stuck in the past and keep everything as it is because everything is a money bottom line issue. Good call as usual.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Annoyed
      - February 26, 2013 at 17:42:27

      I have to agree with Paul. The city council and city in general spend money on ridiculous things, that we already have or have a smaller version of rather than fixing the item and things that need to be fixed. Of course the people of Swift Current want to improve the community but bigger doesnt always mean better. Almost all of our raods are gong shows and are terrible to drive on wrecking vehicles and making our community look poor, not taken care of and gross. So should we really be worried about making a track we already have bigger or putting the money towards area in out community to improve it as a whole.

  • Username
    Paul
    - February 22, 2013 at 18:50:05

    Our major was just telling us that to have decent snow removal taxes would need to go up. For the price of this track, which most of the tax paying public will never use, we could have purchased a new grader and paid an operator for the life of the machine and it would still have been cheaper than this useless expense to tax payers. What is wrong with our city council? Spending money on this kind of stuff is irresponsible to say the least. How about focusing on the needs here for a change and not the wants?

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising