South Saskatchewan River Watershed Stewards hoping to develop Agri-Environmental Group Plan



Published on November 16, 2009
Published on November 16, 2009
 
Topics :
AEGPs , Environmental Group , Provincial Council of ADD Boards , South Saskatchewan River , Agri , Saskatchewan

The South Saskatchewan River Watershed Stewards are hoping that there is enough producer interest in developing an Agri-Environmental Group Plan (AEGP) in the west portion of the South Saskatchewan River Watershed.

The AEGPs are producer driven, awareness based groups which provide local producers the ability to access funding for implementing specific Beneficial Management Practices (BMPs) under the Canada-Saskatchewan Farm Stewardship Program, without completing an individual Environmental Farm Plan. 

AEGPs have a positive cumulative effect on water quality in the watershed, through educating and assisting a significant number of producers in a localized area.

In an effort to determine if there is interest in creating a AEGP, the SSRWS joined forces with the Provincial Council of ADD Boards and the Saskatchewan Watershed Authority to host a field day at Mendham at the beginning of October.  

The Water Well Decommissioning Demonstration and Livestock Watering Systems Field Day discussed some of the practices eligible under the CSFSP program with huge benefits to the watershed, individual’s operations and endangered species.

When most agricultural producers look at their “to-do” list, items often get bumped down to the bottom due to “not enough  time” or “not enough money”. If finances are a limitation to making changes on your operation, the South Saskatchewan River Watershed Stewards (SSRWS) may have a solution. The SSRWS are a community driven, non-profit organization.

Producers saw first hand as an old well at Doug Smith’s farm was decommissioned. 

“In 1973, a 30 inch well on our farm was drilled with a galvanized casing and the water that came from the well was somewhat rusty. In 2006 the well that was 100 feet deep caved in and rusted out and ended up only being 75 feet deep and the water became much rusted. In 2006 we drilled a new well. So after four years we decide to decommission the old well so we would not contaminate the new well.”

  • Page(s)
  • 1
  • 2 -

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Southwest Booster is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising